Continuing Improvements. Tell Us How We’re Driving! Send us Feedback

US may open diplomatic outpost in Iran »

Posted By libsRfunny 3 months, 2 weeks ago in News
9.5

Scale of 1 to 10

Read: 111

Propped: 109

Comments: 151

Click Prop It to Raise Score
Prop it

The Bush administration is considering setting up a diplomatic outpost in Iran in what would mark a dramatic official U.S. return to the country nearly 30 years after the American embassy was overrun and the two nations severed relations.

Read Full Story at news.yahoo.com »

151 Comments Report

Submitted By:
libsRfunny

Related Articles:

Why not submit a story?

Join the Discussion

+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 151
  • 0%
    1-2-Oscar3 months, 2 weeks ago

    In light of the Republican attacks on Sen. Obama, when he stated that he would "talk" to the leaders of Iran, this is indeed astonishing.

    Reply

    58 Replies

    • 0%
      Endoscopy3 months, 2 weeks ago

      Not really. The diplomatic process is through intermediaries. That is what ambassadors are for. Head of state to head of state is a different animal altogether. A lot of prestige goes to anyone who has a meeting with our president. You don't hand that out to everyone.

      Reply

      2 Replies

    • 0%
      Aidenag3 months, 2 weeks ago

      This sure sounds a lot like what those on the right side of the isle would call Appeasement... Personally, i think it's a good thing, and it is something Obama would have no doubt done come 2009.

      Reply

      52 Replies

    • 0%
      Klarissa3 months, 2 weeks ago

      oscar, this is a very different approach - one is diplomatic, the other is Obama jawing with someone who may be voted out of office next year.

      Better to have low level discussions with regular employees at the diplomatic level.

      Reply

      1 Reply

  • 0%
    libsRfunny3 months, 2 weeks ago

    It'll be interesting to see if this happens and, if so, how it turns out.

    If you read the story, Oscar, you will see it is akin to the U.S. diplomatic outpost in Cuba and more of a tool to communicate with those opposed to the current leadership in Iran.

    "Like the one in communist Cuba, an interest section, or de facto embassy, in the Iranian capital would give the United States a presence on the ground through which it can communicate directly with students, dissidents and others without endorsing the government..."

    Reply

    4 Replies

    • 0%
      Dionys3 months, 2 weeks ago

      What it comes down to is that if Obama had suggested this route, you'd be screaming about how he's a traitor and it can only lead to Iran killing every single man, woman and child in America. As it is, though, you'll backpedal to France to explain how when it comes to the Repugnant Cons doing this, it's a fantastic idea.

      Reply

      3 Replies

  • 0%
    splitrch3 months, 2 weeks ago

    "Jaw, Jaw, Jaw is better than War, war, war" Winston Churchill

    If Bush does this I'll give him a lot of credit.

    Reply

    3 Replies

    • 0%
      BB643 months, 2 weeks ago

      I think if Mr. Churchill was in office, we'd see Great Britain still being a great power with an army, navy and air force. I don't think he's sit around talking with Iran. He would have already taken their ports and sunk their ships with the army in Tehran within the week. Oh, the Britain of old.

      Reply

      2 Replies

  • 0%
    tanglang3 months, 2 weeks ago

    This very well could turn out to be one more thing I do not agree with the President on. I'll have to look into this further.

    Reply

    4 Replies

    • 0%
      libsRfunny3 months, 2 weeks ago

      I like it. It's a way of showing the younger generations just what the U.S. is about instead of letting radical, gray-bearded clerics and state-run Iranian media dictate viewpoints and opinions while simultaneously thumbing our noses Iran's president.

      It also might lessen the odds of a nuclear strike.

      Reply

      3 Replies

  • 0%
    Wolfie20073 months, 2 weeks ago

    Diplomatic outpost, sounds like some kind of cowboy thing. I agree with tang, I'll have to consider this before making any judgments.

    Reply

    3 Replies

    • 0%
      splitrch3 months, 2 weeks ago

      Attacking Iran is "a cowboy thing". Talking with one's adversaries is not the same thing as appeasement. The test is in the rationale and results. Think of it this way; if we can reduce the perceived mandate Ahmadinajad has with Iranians, then we can ratchet down tensions in the area. If we attack Iran then we totally legitimize Ahmadinajad and lose a great opportunity to see Iran ease up - I almost said liberalize - but I don't want you to go into convulsions :)

      Many people in Iran are not in favor of their government. This may help them out. The young people there don't hate us as much as some in the US believe.

      Reply
      • 0%
        abntv3 months, 2 weeks ago

        If I were going to be stationed in Iran ..I would be calling it Fort Apache Iran

        Reply
        • 0%
          UnusualSuspect3 months, 2 weeks ago

          wolfie...

          I don't believe it...this is our President talking here...making a good, albeit, late, attempt to communicate with at least some people within Iran. Maybe not the heads of government, but at least it's a good start.

          Think of it this way: when you have an argument with your significant other, you both get angry, maybe not talk much for a day or two. Now...do you never talk to him/her again, or do you try to break the ice for the good of the relationship?

          OK...now...think global...

          Reply
        • 0%
          Endoscopy3 months, 2 weeks ago

          Keep in mind that Iran is a very religious Islamic country. They have Sharia law there. The Quran tells Muslims to attack non Muslims until they avow Islam. This is a basic root of Islam.

          Reply

          37 Replies

          • 0%
            splitrch3 months, 2 weeks ago

            They are not monolithic in their attitudes. The government is as you describe. Many of the citizens would just as soon see them gone.

            Reply

            8 Replies

          • 0%
            libsRfunny3 months, 2 weeks ago

            I've read where the youth in Iran, much like prior generations in post WWII Japan, are more open to change and more cosmopolitan in outlook than their predecessors.

            Reply

            6 Replies