123)This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.
Not a member? Sign-up today!
About Propeller | Frequently Asked Questions | Help
© 2003-2008 Propeller. All Rights Reserved. Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
That is purely your revisionist history and of course it is totally incorrect and deceptive. Are you an IDIOT! And some other f-ckin' idiot gave you a positive as well! You revisionists will not take over this world. Orwell warned us about you long ago. You would however make a good employee at the Ministry of Truth...you are the type of American that is destroying this country...slowly but surely...
Actually, for years I've been trying to figure out who the bigger idiot is: Clinton, or the ones that supported him. You just cleared that up for me. Thanks.
Have you read "Dereliction of Duty: The Eyewitness Account of How Bill Clinton Compromised National Security" by Lt. Col Robert Patterson
The account in the book was disputed by Sandy Berger
We all know what a credible source Berger is, right?
Yes, I have read that book. It is purely a biased account of the Clinton presidency. Anyone with the nickname "Buzz" has to be taken somewhat lightly. I have plenty of issues with the way Clinton conducted himself. Ignoring OBL is not one of them.
The fact that Clinton actually took action against OBL seems to completely escape the both of you. As does the fact that Bush/Cheney seem not the least bit concerned by his continued existence. You are living in a world of smoke and mirrors.