News

New bin Laden message coming on Israel: monitor »155 votes | View all Comments (123)

This page is a permanent archive of the comment below and its replies.
To view this comment in the context of the full discussion for the story, use this link.

avatar
Reply

Clinton gave that a try on August 19th, 1998 but received nothing but condemnation (he was "Wagging the Dog", he blew up an aspirin factory!). He almost got OBL. Never gets any credit for the attempt.

As for your question. If he is in fact dead, yes, it does make a difference. And if that is the case who is speaking on these mysterious messages that seem to be so well timed. Because of his apparent operational ineffectiveness (living high in the mountains with no electronic communication) it should take days, even weeks, for him to get a message out of Waziristan.

avatar
Reply

What the hell are you talking about????? Clinton was offered Bin Laden on a silver platter, but wouldn't leave the f--king golf course.

avatar
Reply

Shhhh ... GW, don't try using "reason" on an unbalanced individual.

avatar
Reply

That is purely your revisionist history and of course it is totally incorrect and deceptive. Are you an IDIOT! And some other f-ckin' idiot gave you a positive as well! You revisionists will not take over this world. Orwell warned us about you long ago. You would however make a good employee at the Ministry of Truth...you are the type of American that is destroying this country...slowly but surely...

avatar
Reply

Actually, for years I've been trying to figure out who the bigger idiot is: Clinton, or the ones that supported him. You just cleared that up for me. Thanks.

avatar
Reply

Have you read "Dereliction of Duty: The Eyewitness Account of How Bill Clinton Compromised National Security" by Lt. Col Robert Patterson

The account in the book was disputed by Sandy Berger

We all know what a credible source Berger is, right?

avatar
Reply

Yes, I have read that book. It is purely a biased account of the Clinton presidency. Anyone with the nickname "Buzz" has to be taken somewhat lightly. I have plenty of issues with the way Clinton conducted himself. Ignoring OBL is not one of them.

The fact that Clinton actually took action against OBL seems to completely escape the both of you. As does the fact that Bush/Cheney seem not the least bit concerned by his continued existence. You are living in a world of smoke and mirrors.

Add Comment

You must log in first to post a comment. Secure Signin

Not a member? Sign-up today!


Who voted for this comment?

Who voted against this comment?