News

Propeller Week In Review: May 8, 2008
This story has mostly positive ratings. 180 votes / 2 sinks

Propeller Week In Review: May 8, 2008

News – The Bush family took a major drubbing this week from the Propeller community. But there were also lively conversations about the North Carolina primary, Richard Dawson, and the gold-plated triumph of "Iron Man."

Tags: wir, week in review, propeller

Report

Filter Comments ›
1 - 50 of 68 Comments by 28 members  RSS Feed for comments

1 2 > »

Add Comment
avatar
Reply

Another excellent WIR James, thanks...

avatar
Reply

Wow, that was fast! (And you're welcome, of course.)

avatar
Reply

LOL!!! I'm on top of things ;~]

avatar
Reply

I think you posted that one before I was actually finished writing the WIR. Some kind of time travel apparatus, I guess.

avatar
Reply

No, I voted then read then made my comment- it had nothing to do with you being the boss ;~] LMAO!!!! 7 minutes had passed between my voting and making my comment ;~] I think!!! LOL

avatar
Reply

My bad, it had been posted for 7 minutes before I got to it... ;~] LOL!!!

avatar
Reply

Well done James that was good reading!

avatar
Reply

7th comment, and twelfth vote...

avatar
Reply

LOL!!!

avatar
Reply

Mr. Candid Camera, thanks for the honorable mention; my eyes are dry, my belt is buckled, and we're ready to go.

avatar
Reply

Good old Richard Dawson.

avatar
Reply

Yep, he Loves kissing the girls!

avatar
Reply

Gotta love Uncle Dave too, that man has the greatest sense of humor of anyone on Prop!!

Good one James!

avatar
Reply

n2n: Your right. Funny man!

avatar
Reply

I'll second you on that n2n!

avatar
Reply

You give him a run for his money ind06, you're a funny guy too. I love it when you two get to going, i sit and laugh till my sides ache.

avatar
Reply

re: turning Iron into Gold, very clever James. Nice week in review. :-)

avatar
Reply

Hey, did you make propeller?

avatar
Reply

Well said indeed.

avatar
Reply

I get in a reference to alchemy whenever I can.

avatar
Reply

I've noticed a couple, James!

In this case though I must point out that iron wasn't a commonly used metal by the old-timers of European alchemy..

Lead, cinnabar, mercury, antimony were some of the more usual ones - all of them extremely toxic..

Between the fumes and the wayward explosions - gunpowder was a product of Chinese alchemy [which concerned itself far more with health and longevity than with gold] the alchemist's life was not always an easy one nor often a long one.

Interestingly lead, which was probably overall the MOST popular, is adjacent to gold on the periodic table - something of which there was no knowledge at the time.

Curious..

And the more closely you examine it the curiouser it gets.

The best information about alchemy on the web - by far - is at www.levity.com/alchemy

Dan Levy is a scholar and a gentleman who lives in NYC and has sponsored this site for over 15 years.

Adam McLean, whose site this is, has a heroic commitment to alchemy.

avatar
Reply

No fair.. posting the WIR while I'm out..

GREAT as usual JamesMarcus...

avatar
Reply

Sorry I missed all that!

avatar
Reply

As we all are sorry missing you mi Querida...

avatar
Reply

PUBLIC STATEMENT. If the prop. team has had anything to do with the much better performance two thumbs up.

avatar
Reply

rdy: And if they don't...

avatar
Reply

2 thumbs up anyway.:)

avatar
Reply

Kudo's to the staff! & the big Kahuna JM!

:oD

avatar
Reply

All credit is due to the wizards on the development team. So a laurel and hearty handshake for them.

avatar
Reply

"Laurel and Hearty?" Two comedic actors are in the development team?

avatar
Reply

They're all multitalents. It's the Propeller Way.

avatar
Reply

Hey! Why not?

avatar
Reply

Another Primary Feather High five!! I really enjoy your style of writing JM.

avatar
Reply

Great job as usual

Thanks

avatar
Reply

Thanks James for all the effort that goes into these recaps. Delightful

avatar
Reply

I keep forgetting that I shouldn't submit my comments in invisible ink..Thank you to all of those positive votes (over 6,000 in the past 6 months). If we get James some eyeglasses do you think he'll recognize a guy with an 8-1 plus-minus ratio instead of patronizing so many net negative posters here?

avatar
Reply

Please stop whining (hands you a pacifier)...

avatar
Reply

It's a reasonable observation. I write like an adult, I ask adult questions, and I don't expect to be treated as a child, especially from another fellow Mass. resident.

I was making a sarcastic observation where too much credibility is given to some incredible people here.

(at least I didn't pull a Wolfie, and neg. the story)

avatar
Reply

Just keep the faith, Cakie. I finally saw one of my snippets in a WIR. Your turn will come.

I've come to take it as a high honor to earn a neg. from Wolfie and his group of wordless ConMen. Shows I am posting sane comments. Sanity, truth, facts... Such things infuriate that lot.

avatar
Reply

"Sanity, truth, facts... Such things infuriate that lot."

Wow, you really are nuts.

avatar
Reply

An even higher compliment. Those who give me a neg AND post insults as an answer to sanity, truth and facts. Ad hominem arguments are the ultimate compliment to your posts. They show that your attacker can't figure out how to discredit your statement, and so turns to slander and name calling -- claiming you are stupid, crazy, (insert favorite insult here) and therefore he's right and you are obviously wrong.

Thanks libsRfunny. Your demonstration of the technique helps a great deal, and also makes me feel even better than a wordless neg.

avatar
Reply

Mr C, I have quoted you in previous WIRs. But some thicker glasses might help, especially with this astigmatism.

avatar
Reply

You do a great job. I have just been having a long week and spent a lot of time here. I got great feedback, so I was looking for some rare closure..Oh well...

Quite honestly, I have been reading your week in review since it began in November and have never seen my comments.

avatar
Reply

I truly thought I had quoted you in one of the earliest WIRs. If not, that's an oversight I'll be sure to rectify.

avatar
Reply

I don't want to interfere with your artistic creativity, it's just a little frustrating to see a few mean-spirited agitators here quoted more than once. They are just looking for attention,. and this would give it to them and encourage more nonsense that they often spew.

You know who they are...

They don't always say bad things, just usually, and the rare

additions that they may make here are not encouraging them to lighten up..So to me it seems patronizing and unworthy.

avatar
Reply

James should feel free to quote who he wishes.

avatar
Reply

I'm sure he does..Aren't you busy loving that jackass??

(Bush)...you still have 7 more months of lovin to give, and believe me you won't have to wait in line!

When you give him a hug can you crush him for us??

avatar
Reply

((Aren't you busy loving that jackass?? (Bush)...you still have 7 more months of lovin to give, and believe me you won't have to wait in line! When you give him a hug can you crush him for us??))

I see what you mean about the "mean-spirited agitators here that are just looking for attention, spewing nonsense". ; )

avatar
Reply

The nonsense you spewed for too many years under your previous pseudonym speaks volumes for your credibility.

You defended his no child left behind disaster, his promise to rebuild New Orleans, and of course the mothers of all deceptions..WMD's, uranium, direct threat, Al Quaida supporters, parades in the streets, Iraqi oil paying for the war, keeping the region stable to keep oil prices under $2.00..You defended them all! NONE were true! NOT ONE!

(that was the nonsense I was referring to)

People like you are responsible for extending his reign of irresponsibility and unaccountability in one of America's darkest eras.

(and we still know that in the closet you still luvyour pathetic prez)..NEXT mistake?? No thanks!

Remember, numbers and facts may confuse you people but YOU and Wolfie are still part of the dwindling minority here!

avatar
Reply

All I'm really looking for are multiple points of view, expressed in a reasonably articulate (and sometimes amusing) way. I'm not really keeping the member's history in mind when I select a comment. And if you look through past WIRs, you'll see the names of people who were subsequently banned for rotten behavior, as well as those of our most civilized participants. But like I said earlier, I thought I had quoted you in a previous WIR, and will be happy to correct that oversight.

1 2 > »

Add Comment

You must log in first to post a comment. Secure Signin

Not a member? Sign-up today!


Who voted on this story?

View all (180) »

Who sunk this story?

Channels
AnchorsArt & DesignAutos
BooksCareers & JobsCelebrities
Do No EvilDo-It-YourselfFamily
FoodGadgets & TechGay & Lesbian
Health & FitnessHumorLove & Personals
MenMoneyMovies
MusicNewsPets
PoliticsPopular VideosReal Estate
ReligionScienceShopping
SportsTelevisionTravel
VideoVideo GamesWomen