Markets tumble after Bear Stearns rescue fails to reassure »
Posted by: JamesMarcus 5 months, 2 weeks agoShare prices around the world fell sharply today as shock waves from the collapse of US investment bank Bear Stearns swept through financial markets.
Read Full Story at guardian.co.uk
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 49
-
0%
nikkibabe5 months, 2 weeks ago
Another 4 years of Bush with a McCain face mask will speed up the entry of USA to the third world.
India & China will benefit most while UAE(Dubai) will become the financial capital of the world. South Korea, China & Dubai will end up buying major US icons like Citicorp, Merril Lynch, JP Morgan and airlines like AA, United, Delta.
McCain will keep telling the "SURGE" is a success.
Neo conservatives then can put their tongue out in astonishment.
Reply-
0%
ETproductions5 months, 2 weeks ago
You are so right. Bush is on track to win the worst president in US history award. Previous contenders included:
James Buchanan - Perhaps the most experienced in government of any president ever elected, he did nothing as the union crumbled around him and the country erupted into civil war.
Herbert Hoover - Under his watch, and the other Republicans who preceded him, wealth continued to flow to the top 1% till they owned half of all the wealth of the nation. That triggered the Great Depression.
Reply -
0%
tanglang5 months, 2 weeks ago
Actually Nikki, what caused this whole mess is people who have no idea about what to do with their money getting in over their heads. Purchasing homes that are out of their price range and getting sucked into ARMs only finding out what ARM means after their being foreclosed on.
You can try to blame this on the President and the evil "neocon" conspiracy all you want but all you'll be doing is making a fool of yourself.
Reply -
0%
mark-stevens5 months, 2 weeks ago
NEARLY THREE YEARS AGO... Greenspan stood in front of Congress and told them "if the housing boom isn't reigned in, it could bankrupt the country" what came of that warning??
About the worse president, besides the depression, Hoover openly supported the KKK. Ask anyone with that knowledge who was the worse I believe Bush will alway come up short.
Bush still gas a few months to surpass Hoover!!
was the worse
Reply -
0%
mark-stevens5 months, 2 weeks ago
The federal reseve did the bailing, that is not tax payer money... who in the hell is the federal reserve... their website leaves a lot unanswered
Reply
-
-
0%
TweekerchickQC5 months, 2 weeks ago
Ughhh. Good god, $2 a share?!
Im going to have grey hair by the end of this.
Work in finance, they say. Job security, they say....
Reply -
0%
ETproductions5 months, 2 weeks ago
Here's an interesting question. When over a trillion dollars in total value evaporates from the economy, who owns the condenser that collects it?
Reply -
0%
quackpot5 months, 2 weeks ago
J.P. Morgan pikes up Bear Sterns for a song ($2/share) AND the Fed provides 30 billion in funding?
So, the average Joe tax-payer ponies up about $400/family of four so that the big boys at J.P. Morgan can make a killing off of this disaster?
Over the next year-and-a-half, J.P. Morgan expects to make a billion in after tax dollars off of this deal.
Reply-
0%
Teech5 months, 2 weeks ago
...."So, the average Joe tax-payer ponies up about $400/family of four so that the big boys at J.P. Morgan can make a killing off of this disaster?..."
Ah, yes, how sweet it is to be a fat cat Republican! The plan is working beautifully! When 99% of ALL wealth is in the hands of the ultra 1% it will be sweeter indeed! Hey, the $400 per family contribution is NOTHING compared to the $3,400 per PERSON, man, woman and child, contribution for Bushie's war!
But the ultimate is the $34,000, that's 34 grand, PER PERSON share for Bushie's 10 trillion national debt!
Vote for McCain and a straight Republican ticket to make those tax cuts permanent, keep the war going for 10, 20 more years, and COMPLETE THE PLAN!
Don't forget the $300 Bushie borrowed, from the deficit of course, to give you come April or May. Whooooeeeee! Go wild with it! And the 45 million dollars to send you the letter reminding you of how wonderful he is!
It's beautiful, baby...beautiful!
Reply-
0%
mark-stevens5 months, 2 weeks ago
Screw "it's the republican's fault" Greenspan told both parties three years ago that we were heading the country into bankruptcy if they did not stop the housing boom.
Washington that liberal democrat state looked out the window as Weyerhauser made Billions selling lumbar for that boom. Oh yeah Weyerhauser is one of the largest housing loaner's in the country, and employer in the state
They just sold their packaging division for 3.5 billion They just bought that five years ago!!
Reply
-
-
-
-
0%
nostalgia5 months, 2 weeks ago
As senator from New York, Clinton has received the most money from employees of large Wall Street firms. Bear Stearns employees contributed the most to Clinton with total donations of $152,000. Likely Republican nominee John McCain received $47,000 from Bear Stearns employees and Obama got $36,000.
Obama is the biggest recipient of donations from JPMorgan employees â;; Obama received $270,000, Clinton's contributions were nearly $200,000 and McCain's were more than $60,000. According to McCain's latest personal financial disclosure report, his wife and dependent children had between $3 million and $7 million invested in JPMorgan financial instruments.
http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5ityr953buDYK...
Reply
-
-
-
-
0%
mozzer5 months, 2 weeks ago
Former CEO Cayne's $900 million stake has been whittled down to $13 million. Poor fellow.
And the little guy? Wiped Out.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/servlet/story/RT...
Reply
-
-
-
0%
cleare5 months, 2 weeks ago
a sad statement on the fragility of the global economy which is based on perceived value, rather than on anything tangible.
i am often amazed and disgusted at the extremely poor level of competence in global corporate leadership. then those same failed leaders land safely thanks to platinum parachutes.
Reply -
0%
simonsez5 months, 2 weeks ago
Presidents get too much credit ... good and bad. Not Bushes fault.
What is hard to understand is why financial professionals were so willing to bet the farm to try to get double digit returns.
These are 50-60 year old professionals with 30 years experience in banking and investments choosing to make the kind of mistakes they made to achieve better numbers and a larger bonus. It borders on criminal in my mind.
Reply-
-
0%
blowback5 months, 2 weeks ago
Market forces.
It defied reason and better understanding
but it was the market trend and they all
followed it.
Such is the nature of capitalism.
It is not the application of intelligence.
It is the spasm of impulse and the desire
to not be left behind.
These were 50-60 year old guys who just
wanted to keep their jobs.
They knew it would wreak havoc in the
long term, but to say you were right even
when it cost you your job is cold comfort.
Reply
-
-
0%
nostalgia5 months, 2 weeks ago
This has been coming and will likely hit others as well
Bear Stearns Faces Collapse of
$6 Billion Sub-Prime Unit
June 14, 2007 (EIRNS)â;;Bear Stearns put up $4 billion in Mortgage Backed Securities (MBS) for sale in a desperate effort to shore up its losses in the sub-prime blow-out. Two of its hedge funds are in trouble, and if both are liquidated, as many on Wall Street expect, then a subsidiary of Bear Stearns, Everquest Financial, could go out of business as well, just as it was about to conduct an IPO.
http://www.larouchepub.com/pr/2007/070614bear_s...
"Plans announced Thursday by Rep Barney Frank, a Massachusetts Democrat, and Senator Christopher Dodd, a Connecticut Democrat, that would provide billions of dollars to states to buy homes in foreclosure and prod lenders into writing down the value of some mortgages"
http://www.berkshireeagle.com/editorials/ci_858...
Does that mean the US taxpayers will hold the mortgages on all of these homes?
Reply-
0%
quackpot5 months, 2 weeks ago
Forget about the little guy. The Paulson Plan is to save the Big Banks. Paulson's idea is to give the Big Bankers $200 billion of tax payer money in exchange for the worthless paper that they created. Who knows a few pennies might trickle down to those whose homes are in forelosure.
$200 billion is about $2500/family of four - only about twice as large as the celebrated stimulus package for the every day Joe.
More of Bush's welfare for the ultra-rich program.
Reply
-
-
0%
joeblowe5 months, 2 weeks ago
Odd odor here - I heard somewhere that B/S was around $30 on the open market. But they sold out for $2.00? If true, something ain't right there. Again, if true, I'd expect to hear about a LOT of lawsuits. ... HaHaHa - I just googled for a price history chart, and there is ALREADY a web site set up to sue for lost value: www.bearstearnsinvestors.com
Reply-
0%
mark-stevens5 months, 2 weeks ago
I get all the BS I want for free, as far as that B/S the subprime crooks should be in jail not bankruptacy.
Reply
-
-
-
-
0%
TweekerchickQC5 months, 2 weeks ago
For real? You learn something every day. :)
Yea Im a psych major and now I work in financial engineering.
Im going to be all grey by the end of this year I just know it!
Reply
-
-
-
0%
walden35 months, 2 weeks ago
This really angers me. These scumbags run their business into the ground, take their million $ bonuses, sell lousy products to those too lazy to do their own research and then leave the taxpayers holding the bag.
Why no outcry about this socialist/communist behavior of the government propping up big business, big money banks?
No government bailout. Let the chips fall where they may. Allow economic Darwinism to rule.
Reply-
-
0%
ETproductions5 months, 2 weeks ago
Yeah, tang. There is really no good answer now. The last time we let the free market handle it was 1929. That time, the meltdown lasted right up till the start of WWII. The war put enough people to work to end 13 years of misery, bread lines massive unemployment and workers' rights in the toilet because employers could tell workers, "There's a line of 1000 people waiting to replace you."
But bail out the top management who took unconscionable risks to meet short term profit goals and get massive bonuses, and you just tell them to stay the course. The taxpayers (you and me) will always bear the consequences, and they will always get the rewards.
Reply
-
-
-
0%
buckheadd5 months, 2 weeks ago
The Bank of England moved to stabilise the markets this morning, offering £5bn of three-day funds in a move designed to bring overnight interest rates down. Banks scrambled for the cash, asking for nearly five times more than was on offer.
US president George Bush attempted to reassure the markets this afternoon, saying that the Fed had taken "strong and decisive" action.
"In the long run our economy's going to be fine. Right now we're dealing with a difficult situation."
BUCKHEADD FOR PRESIDENT! 2008! VOTE FOR ME AND YOU WILL EMBARK UPON AN UNFEIGNED JOURNEY HELPING PEOPLE HERE IN THE USA AND PEOPLE ALL AROUND THE WORLD!
Reply -
0%
Gransater5 months, 2 weeks ago
It would appear that when you replace rules, oversight and responsability with a free for all mentality with the aim of creating rapid fire commissions, this is what you end up with.
I find it difficult to classify whats going on as investments. Its more like a lottery of chance, where if you win you get to keep the spoils, and if you fail, your favorite uncle will come to the rescue. End result is that the little guy ends up paying for this mess twice. Once in lost principal and secondly when his taxes end up bailing out the big guy.
Of course, listening to some people, you are told that the economy is going ganbusters, and this is only a small bleep.
Isn't it time to bring back responsability to our economic system? It seems that it was working quite well, even when the rate of return on investment was 6%/year or less. The cost of living was stable, and most people who wanted work had employment.
Reply -
-
0%
nostalgia5 months, 2 weeks ago
Government has been pressuring banks for years to make more home loans available
Remeber all the complaints about "redlining" - it goes back to the late 1980's
Congress fixed 'redlining.' Result: Today's foreclosures
Redlining was the supposed practice of banks refusing to extend loans based on skin color and, in effect, drawing red lines on maps around minority neighborhoods. Though this particular series did go on to win a Pulitzer that year, some contended the idea was bunkum - that what banks were really doing was refusing to offer loans to bad risks, some of whom happened to be minorities.
Regulators and other federal officials joined with community groups to persuade banks to ease up on their standards. Congress itself weighed in with legislation pressuring lenders to provide home mortgages with far less hesitation than good business sense dictated.
An unintended consequence was today's ballooning number of foreclosures.
Reply-
0%
nostalgia5 months, 2 weeks ago
Other reasons help account for the mortgage crisis, of course, such as some borrowers acting irresponsibly or even fraudulently and some banks thinking that a little deception here and there would not come back to haunt them. But the rush to extend mortgages to people who could not afford them and who sometimes had a history of not paying their bills was also instigated in no small measure by the redlining hyperbole.
Testimony about all of this comes from a tellingly detailed New York Post piece by Stan Liebowitz, an economist at the University of Texas at Dallas, and at the conclusion of an article by Alan Reynolds, a senior fellow at the Cato Institute.
http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/145/story/10...
Anyone think congress will admit they are part of the problem??
Reply
-
Submitted By:
JamesMarcus
James Marcus is a writer, translator, critic, and editor. He is the author of Amazonia: Five Years at the Epicenter of the Dot-Com Juggernaut and ...
Also submitted:
- 8.5 - Propeller Week In Review: August 28, 2008
- 1.0 - Chris Matthews Brings on the Noise
- 5.9 - Bush Bashing and the Great Marble Round-Up
- 4.0 - "A Sacred Trust": Five Veterans Talk About Obama
Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
Also Propping This Article
Groups Watching This
No groups are watching this story. Why not share it with your group?
