Gaza City Goes Dark After Power Cut »
Posted By TechnologyExpert 8 months, 3 weeks ago in NewsGaza City was plunged into darkness Sunday after Israel blocked the shipment of fuel that powers its only electrical plant in retaliation for persistent rocket attacks by Gaza militants.
Read Full Story at breitbart.com »
Submitted By:
I am Editor-in-Chief at Alice Hill's RealTechNews (http://www.realtechnews.com). I also have my own blog (Tech-Ex) at http://TechnologyExpert.Blogspot.com. Finally ...
Also submitted:
Related Articles:
Why not submit a story?
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 178
-

Thinker228 months, 3 weeks ago
From the article:
>> "We have the choice to either cut electricity on babies in the maternity ward or heart surgery patients or stop operating rooms," Gaza Health Ministry official Dr. Moaiya Hassanain said.
Well, not exactly. The people of Gaza also have the choice to convince their leaders to live in peace with their Israeli neighbors.
>> A defiant Hamas said its attacks on Israel would not cease because of the sanctions.
>> "We will not raise the white flag, and we will not surrender, " Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri said Sunday.
Oops! Apparently, attacking Israel is preferable for democratically elected Palestinian leadership in Gaza over both the babies in the maternity ward or heart surgery patients. If this is the case, it's NOT Israel that should be blamed for the results
Reply-

Daylight8 months, 3 weeks ago
Thinker22
Oops! Apparently, attacking Israel is preferable for democratically elected Palestinian leadership in Gaza over both the babies in the maternity ward or heart surgery patients. If this is the case, it's NOT Israel that should be blamed for the results
Oops! Who says that Israel is a legitimate country which oppress and occupy Palestine? people who support this illegal entity must come forward to send them back to the countries they came from. These Zionist are an obstacle to peace among the Jews, Christians and Muslims. Hamas has the right to attack Israel because Israel is an occupier and also they build settlements everyday, they don't stop at that they oppress Palestinians everyday with the support of America, Britain and the Europe. The Israelis are illegal immigrants, the Palestinians must be given the right to decide on their fate, if they don't want the Israel in their territory they must be asked to leave, to the same destination from where they came.
Reply-

x00000000098 months, 3 weeks ago
Nothing wrong with a democratic elected government, but when that government abuses its power and takes over their own country from any opposition (in this case Abbas) then that is no democracy. Seems to me that we have three states over there now. Israel, Palestine (West bank), And whatever the armed militia controlled Gaza strip should be called (not Palestine). I don't see why the Palestinians don't realize that; hay wait, they are doing this to themselves by envoking a endless war that can't be won, get rid of the ones in their own territory running the show, and start working on making what they have better. In stead of constantly blaming their neighbors for their problems and trying to take from them.
Reply
-

browntiger8 months, 3 weeks ago
-

Thinker228 months, 3 weeks ago
> Hammas seems to have way to much money....
The fact is that Hamas has enough money to acquire those missiles they shoot into Israel as well as thousands of automatic rifles and millions of bullets for them. Enough to shoot tens of thousands of those rounds into air at every occasion... but they do not have money to pay for water, electricity and other basic services.
As I (and Hamas spokesman Sami Abu Zuhri) said it's all a matter of preferences.
Reply
-

AnteUp8 months, 3 weeks ago
Thinker22 ~
We wouldn't want to let the other side of the story intrude.
On CNN not moments ago - their report from Jerusalem about Gaza - the one time only opening of the checkpoint to allow humanitarian supplies (oil, medicine,etc.) is being brought about because of global pressure on the Israeli government.
Also - that Israeli citizens in Sderot and other affected communities are applying pressure for the Israeli government to do something to halt the firing of the rockets.
How about Hamas' offer of a ceasefire in June 2006?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/5082820.stm
Or ANOTHER ceasefire offer December 2007 which Israel refused to even discuss?
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/spages/937196.html
Reply-

walden38 months, 3 weeks ago
I looked at your two links-
The first from the BBC quotes the Israeli military, 'when it is quiet, we will respond with quiet.' Also in the article, "Since the deaths, Hamas has fired dozens of home-made rockets at Israel, causing panic and several injuries."
The second from Haaretz states that the Israeli government won't negotiate with Hamas until Hamas recognizes Israel's right to exist. Would you negotiate with those who don't even acknowledge your right to be?
In the past when Israel has agreed to ceasefires the terror groupo have used the ceasefire as an opportunity to regroup and rearm.
Reply -

Thinker228 months, 3 weeks ago
> How about Hamas' offer of a ceasefire in June 2006?
How about their "hudna" (cease fire) in 2005 when Hamas claimed that they've actually ceased fire but Israel recorded 2,990 (Two Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety) terrorist attacks? Sorry, dear, in my dictionary "cease fire" means exactly that.
> Or ANOTHER ceasefire offer December 2007 which Israel refused to even discuss?
Discuss with WHOM? Hamas did not and does not recognize Israel. In addition, their "offer" explicitly stated that Hamas would not prevent other terrorist "factions" from attacking Israel and Israelis. Islamic Jihad immediately declared that attacks would continue... Sorry, dear, in my dictionary "cease fire" means exactly that.
Reply
-
-
-

Thinker228 months, 3 weeks ago
>>The regular fuel shipment from Israel did not arrive Sunday because the fuel terminal was closed, and the power plant has almost no reserves, said Rafik Maliha, director of the power plant.
>>The U.N. organization in charge of Palestinian refugees warned the blockade would drastically affect hospitals, sewage treatment and water facilities.
>>"The logic of this defies basic humanitarian standards," said Christopher Gunness, spokesman for the U.N. Relief and Works Agency, or UNRWA.
Apparently, Mr. Christopher Gunness' believes that in response to Palestinian missiles Israel has to supply fuel and electricity to Gaza thus allowing the Palestinians to build more of these missiles. No wonder this "logic" is defied.
Reply-

Dionys8 months, 3 weeks ago
Three times as many Palestinians have been killed in the Israeli-Palestinian conflicts. Israel has engaged in intentional genocide in the area. Cutting off supplies (or destroying basic needs or infrastructure such as they have in Lebanon through bombing electricity or water plants, or even bridges)is par for the Israeli course. Isn't it interesting how Israeli ghettos for the Palestinians who have been in resettlement camps for generations are increasingly becoming more and more like Nazi ghettos.
Reply-

idov8 months, 3 weeks ago
"Intentional genocide." I can give you a situation where every Palestinian would disagree with that statement. Let the Palestininians and the Tutsis vote in 1994 if they would be willing to change places and fates. Number of Palestinians in favor, zero. Number of Tutsis, all. If they had switched, a million Palestininians would be dead and all Tutsis would be alive. If Palestinians themselves don't think they are living in "genocide" situation, where do you get your information? Besides that their numbers have been increasing every year, which hardly indicates an attempt to wipe them out physically. Political rhetoric to be effective has to be, like advertising, plausible. Otherwise you are insulting the intelligence of the audience and that's doesn't win you any friends, friend.
Reply -

Thinker228 months, 3 weeks ago
> Three times as many Palestinians have been killed in the Israeli-Palestinian conflicts.
Three hundred times as many Japanese have been killed in the WWII than Americans. Nevertheless it were the Japanese who started the war and it were the Japanese who were responsible for its results.
The Palestinian Arabs started their (separate from other Arabs) war against Israel back in 1964 when they've established the PLO and deliberate mass murder of Israelis was elevated to a new level. 44 years later the Palestinian Arabs still prefer this war to a negotiated peace... and no, there are no "ghettos" or "camps" in Israel. Not a single one.
Reply
-
-
-

Thinker228 months, 3 weeks ago
>>The British group Oxfam called Israel's cutoff "ineffective as well as unlawful." Gisha, an Israeli group that has fought the fuel cutbacks in Israel's Supreme Court, said: "Punishing Gaza's 1.5 million civilians does not stop the rocket fire. It only creates an impossible 'balance' of human suffering on both sides of the border."
I have to agree with their opinions. Much more effective (and lawful) way to stop the rocket fire would be to turn Gaza into a giant pile of rubble... just like the Allies did in Germany and Japan back in 1945.
Reply-

AnteUp8 months, 3 weeks ago
Thinker22 ~
You mention Oxfam - which brings an old story to mind.
The link below is to a NYT article in 2000 that references
an event between Hillary and Suha Arafat - the infamous "kiss" - in 1999:
http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=...
The text below (from a blog) is a very typical diatribe on the same subject:
Hillary Clinton standing next to Suha Arafat in Ramallah while Suha Arafat accused Israelis and Jews of deliberately poisoning Palestinian children. It was a blatantly antiSemitic lie. It was basically a rehash of a claim made in the Middle Ages that Jews poisoned wells and thereby poisoned the water supply and caused the bubonic plague. After Hillary was safely back in the US and after Hillary saw the criticism that her gutlessness recived, Hillary then condemned Suha Arafat.
Boy! Did she. The Israel Lobby said, "JUMP" and Hill said,
"How high?"
Continued below:
Reply-

AnteUp8 months, 3 weeks ago
AnteUp ~ continued to Thinker22
Only problem with all that? Take a read Thinker22 -
It WAS true!
Read, "Poisoning the Village Wells"
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?...
And that my friend is my problem with Hillary - not that she
might be a b*ll-busting progressive but that she did not
stand up for the truth - she wilted when confronted with
AIPAC pressure. Oxfam tried to protect the wells many times
from the deliberate contamination by the settlers.
Bet you never heard that on CNN - neither did I.
Once again - thank goodness for the internet!
Reply
-
-
-

TheRealizer8 months, 3 weeks ago
-

Thinker228 months, 3 weeks ago
> The U.S. and Israel are good at reducing entire areas into rubble!!!!!!
Well, if you believe in your words above you'll have no troubles to list a couple of such areas Israel reduced into rubble. On the other hand, if you can not answer this question I'll have to conclude that you DO NOT believe in your own words...
The best definition of a liar is "one who does not believe in his/her own words."
Reply-

Daylight8 months, 3 weeks ago
Thinker22
The best definition of a liar is "one who does not believe in his/her own words."
The best definition of a liar is that the one who repeats his lie hundreds of thousands of times and believe it as the truth. Israel has been taught an trained by the Hitlers regime, so there is no difference between Hitler and Olmert today.
Reply
-
-

