FBI: Al Qaeda May Strike U.S. Shopping Malls in LA, Chicago »
Posted by: TimALoftis 9 months, 3 weeks ago393 Comments Report this Story
The FBI is warning that al Qaeda may be preparing a series of holiday attacks on U.S. shopping malls in Los Angeles and Chicago, according to an intelligence bulletin distributed to law enforcement authorities across the country this morning.
Read Full Story at blogs.abcnews.com
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 393
-
0%
PsychoHosebeast9 months, 3 weeks ago
What would the holidays be, without the government jamming fear down our throats once again?
Reply-
-
-
0%
Codi69349 months, 3 weeks ago
Your hatred for this President is clouding your thought. With a comment like that you do not see, and do not want to see the problem that we, as a nation, are facing. Keep you blinders on and HOPE nothing ever happens.
Reply-
0%
architekker9 months, 3 weeks ago
Don't listen to engineer, he engineered himself as one of the lone twisted Jim Jones follower. Oh yeah he said, my wife has a fetus and it's ok to abort it! Kill the fetus, you mean kill the baby, Good Lord, he is pro choice and he don't give a crap about human rights nor life.
Reply -
0%
Grrr9 months, 3 weeks ago
And your blind support for this President must be based on pure delusion. Who has the blinders on here?
Go ahead. Live in the fear they feed you. The only thing I'm afraid of is the chicken littles like W and yourself. The sky isn't falling, but the house of cards you worship is.
We are not facing any problems that any other nation isn't facing, we are just doing a poorer job of it.
Reply-
0%
wallyone9 months, 3 weeks ago
yes and i heard they were thinking about putting a man on the moon to find out if there is really an american flag up there..
Reply -
0%
Codi69349 months, 3 weeks ago
Grrr
I have fought in this war. I have seen what they are willing to do not only to others but to themselves.
Am I a chicken, no ,not by any means. I am afraid, yes, but not to the point of panic. What scares me the most is that others in this country can not see what is at stake here. This is a culture clash. And their will is a he*l of a lot stronger then ours. They will attack again, the odds are too great in there favor. One will get through. Then what will you say, we deserved it, bad info, what are we doing, thought we were winning?
Wake up before it is too late!!
Reply-
-
0%
walden39 months, 3 weeks ago
codi-
you're making out to be more than it is.
is there a threat? yes.
is it from extreme radicals? yes.
is it a culture clash? not by any means.
Reply-
0%
Codi69349 months, 3 weeks ago
Dude you have to be kidding me!! All you have to do is listen to them. They have made there focus very clear. We convert or face death.
Reply-
-
0%
walden39 months, 3 weeks ago
there are one billion muslims. my point is that it is less than 1% that are extremists. don't you think most of them are like us and too busy trying to make ends meet than trying to convert people halfway around the world? it's a sliver of muslims. the extremists make the news. people yelling, screaming and burning stuff is a lot better for ratings then people going about their own business.
don't buy into the hate.
i'm not saying there isn't a threat. there is, but it's not a clash of culture or a religious war or world war three. not yet anyways.
Reply-
-
0%
Candida9 months, 3 weeks ago
Codi6934; "They have too many followers willing to do us harm."
So what are you planning to do? Hide in your basement throughout the holidays? How are you supposed to respond to such vague warnings: '"We have no credible, specific information suggesting an imminent attack," a DHS official said.'
This is fear-mongering and it plays into the hands of the terrorists. They don't have to do anything; they can cause tremendous damage by a few words.
Reply
-
-
0%
Thinker229 months, 3 weeks ago
> ...there are one billion muslims. my point is that it is less than 1% that are extremists. don't you think most of them are like us...?
No, I do not think so. If they were "like us" they would not allow the "less than 1%" of extremists amontg them to terrorize the entire world. If they were "like us" the 99% of supposedly peaceful Muslims wouild force the 1% of violent extremists to behave... just like "us" forced nad continue to force the White Supremacists, the Nation of Islam", the KKK etc. to keep relatively low profile.
You see, 99% of "us" CONDEMN our extremists. On the other hand, 99% of "them" who are, supposedly, "like us" SUPPORT their extremists. As a result, "our" extremists are on the fringes of society. "Their" extremists RULE the Iranians, the Lebanese, the Palestinians, the Sudanese...
Reply -
0%
Thinker229 months, 2 weeks ago
> ...there are one billion muslims. my point is that it is less than 1% that are extremists.
Even if this was true (it is not) it would not change a thing. You see, 99% of Americans are honest hard working peaceful citizens. Less than 1% are violent murderers. Nevertheless, the Americanss spend hundreds of Billions every year on police, FBI, courts, jails, security services, lawyers, locks, insurance, etc. to protect themselves nad their properties from criminals.
Similarly, we do not have a problem with the 99% (or whatever the number) of peaceful Muslims. It's the violent Islamist murderers we have a problem with.
Reply
-
-
0%
StarLord9 months, 3 weeks ago
How much of the Moslem population do the extremists represent? Not much. I have attended university alongside moslem women, many of them in the hard sciences (Chemistry, Physics etc), medicine, law etc. etc. I had the opportunity to spend some time with them, and burqa aside, they were lively, energetic and intelligent conversationalists, with real plans to go out into the world and make their own living. Neither they nor their families see this as being inconsistant with the teachings of Islam.
So, no, it is not a "culture clash". It is a bunch of sidelined, irrelevant extremists lashing out at anything they can hurt, precisely in order to provoke an extreme reaction from the West, so that they can become relevant again. Let's not give them what they want, right?
Reply-
0%
not2needy9 months, 3 weeks ago
And they get exactly the reaction they want!
We have gone through this every year since 9/11.
Terrorists are going to attack shopping malls, terrorists are going to be at the Olympics, terrorists are going to be at the Ky Derby. Terrorists here terrorists there.
Don't they ever get tired of playing the same old stupid games. They need to get a new game plan!
Reply -
0%
Thinker229 months, 3 weeks ago
> I have attended university alongside moslem women..."
You forgot to mention WHERE was this university located.
Was it in Pakistan? West Bank? Gaza? Iran? Iraq? Syria? Saudi Arabia?
Reply
-
-
-
-
0%
markoller9 months, 3 weeks ago
If you fought in Iraq, you are a patsy. The official line about the destruction of the Twin Trade Towers and WTC7 is as ridiculous as blaming the attack on Pearl Harbor on Arab hijackers crashing planes into ships.
Bear in mind, that the United States government also pretends that the attack on the USS Liberty was a case of "mistaken identity." Do the ZOG dupes also believe that?
Reply-
0%
Thinker229 months, 3 weeks ago
> "...the United States government also pretends that the attack on the USS Liberty was a case of "mistaken identity." Do the ZOG dupes also believe that?
Apparently, the vast majority of people knowing the facts and knowing how to use their brains also believe so. If you disagree can you explain WHAT was it?
For starters you will tell us WHAT were the tremendous benefits Israel got from DELIBERATELY attacking its only ally during a war for its survival.
Reply
-
-
0%
LeftTurn9 months, 3 weeks ago
What is at stake here? Who controls which oil field is the only thing really at stake in the end.
It was someones bright idea to use fear and propaganda to allow our governments the freedom to act how they choose and not for the people, who elected them for the purpose of giving Americans a greater chance of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness in this country.
If oil companies and certain families would just let technology take it's real course as far as alternative fuels and transportation, we'd have no reason to be "hated" for stealing someone's land and oil for our profit and consumption.
Although I completely respect the men and women that fought for freedom in this country, I actually feel sorry for the men and women today who have been lied to, you weren't fighting for Iraq's democracy, you were fighting to save an already defeated American dollar, and for the rights of certain families to obtain oil contracts so they can stay filthy rich.
You overslept.
Reply
-
-
-
0%
Grrr9 months, 3 weeks ago
Lose a lot of bets, don't you?
I'm afraid of the fascist state that has sprung up around me, abetted by head-in-the-sand idiotic cretins like yourself. But that's about it. For the rest of it, I say, like your hero, "bring it on". We've earned it.
Reply -
0%
BuffaloJ9 months, 3 weeks ago
ok, lemme try this again. I accidentally send my post to Wolfie privately...ooops
Hmmm, so global warming is readily accepted by the scientific community and you don't believe it but you do believe messages from our administration which started a war based on lies, promotes war profiteering and puts the neocon agenda above the American public.
I don't agree with your statement...
Reply -
0%
hamy9 months, 3 weeks ago
Yes. The entire world and all of it's leaders and scientists are all wrong. You are right! The glaciers in the antarctic are not melting and the weather patterns are right on track.
Oh...and Bush and Rove are the ones who came up with Climate Change. They thought that Global Warming was too alarmist.
See? When the alarms work against them, they change the names of things to make them not so alarming. But, when it comes to their foreign policy, TERROR, DEATH, MURDER, BOMBS!
Reply
-
-
0%
GLee9 months, 3 weeks ago
Just think...... If we would just talk to them they might not attack us anymore. If we quit tracking them down they may just go home to thier mommies.
GOOD GRIEF PEOPLE! It is called WAR and it is all over us. We must be on the offensive and not come home and hide and hope they won't come 'visit'. If we don't hunt them down and exterminate these 'terrorist' they will bring the fight to YOUR BACK YARD. But not to worry......... you libs relax because we will do all of the dirty work so you guys can protest and such. Not to worry....
Reply-
-
0%
Thinker229 months, 3 weeks ago
> ...I would be much more relaxed if you didn't do the dirty work.
I'm sure you would. Very few people are more relaxed than dead ones... and you would be dead sooner or later if mass murderers were allowed to kill as many people as they want without anyone doing the "dirty work" of fighting them back.
Reply
-
-
0%
markoller9 months, 3 weeks ago
GLee,
"If we don't hunt them down and exterminate these 'terrorist' they will bring the fight to YOUR BACK YARD." An exterminator is worse than a terrorist, and if you think that a few Muslim terrorists are a threat to a nuclear super power, with a population of 300 million, you are far more insane than any terrorist.
Reply-
0%
Thinker229 months, 2 weeks ago
> ...if you think that a few Muslim terrorists are a threat to a nuclear super power, with a population of 300 million, you are far more insane than any terrorist.
No one thinks so. This does not mean, however, that these "few Muslims terrorists" should be allowed to murder thousands of innocent civilians.
Reply
-
-
-
-
0%
saintetienne9 months, 3 weeks ago
"Keep your blinders on and HOPE nothing ever happens."
Codi, with that statement, you just NAILED the M.O. of the Libs.
Yes, the Chicken Little, Chicken-sh*t Libs who, too cowardly and too politically correct to admit that Muslim extremism just MIGHT be a problem, have chosen "global warming" (pause, for snicker and muffled laughter), yes, that's right folks - Global Warming(!) - as the new enemy to fight, because, not to be outdone by the Repubs, the Libs need to show that they're fighting for SOMEthing.
Never mind the fact that 9/11 occured. Forget about the bombing of the USS Cole, the bombings of the African embassies, the 1993 World Trade Center attack, the bombing in Bali, the recent slaughter in a Madrid train station, the subway attacks in London, the Muslim riots in Paris, the almost daily attacks across the Middle East, the Phillippines and Indonesia....
No, we've got an immediate problem on our hands - global warming!
HAHAHAHAHA!!!
Reply-
0%
HannibalBarca9 months, 3 weeks ago
NUMPTY:No, we've got an immediate problem on our hands - global warming!....Then shut up you bag of hot air, do you honestly believe that if the terrorists wanted to do damage to a shopping mall that they could be stopped?
Maybe sometimes but if they wanted to the would, life has a different value to them, dieing to kill a few infidels is an honour, so go back to your burgers and try and use your head more than just keeping your ears apart and ask yourself, why haven't they attacked USA in force again
Reply -
-
0%
not2needy9 months, 3 weeks ago
Hamy, NO! They don't get it!
You want to know what it's going to take to make them get it?when a Democrat president does the same thing and then they start whining about it!!
Reply -
-
0%
hamy9 months, 2 weeks ago
You can't kill a style of killing. There will always be terrorists just as there always has been.
And don't you think we should be in Saudi Arabia or more heavily invested in Afghanistan since that is where the terrorists who attacked us lived? Should we not be fighting them where they truly came from rather than fighting them in a country that had nothing to do with attacking us?
Where does that fit into your "kill them all" idiocy?
Reply-
0%
Thinker229 months, 2 weeks ago
> There will always be terrorists just as there always has been.
Not necessarily. If they're killed at a faster rate than they reproduce then, eventually, they'll become history. Still, please feel free to offer a more effective way to eliminate terrorism than physically eliminating the terrorists.
> Should we not be fighting them where they truly came from rather than fighting them in a country that had nothing to do with attacking us?
No. We should fight terrorists where they are NOW and not where they were last year.
> Where does that fit into your "kill them all" idiocy?
You tell me. For starters you'll define what "idiocy" means.
Reply
-
-
-
-
0%
markoller9 months, 3 weeks ago
If our own government and the Mossad blows up a shopping mall, and every step of the plot is broadcast live on television, you and your kind will blame Muslim terrorists.
Reply
-
-
0%
unome29 months, 3 weeks ago
Acturally, you should take your blinders off and investigate exactly who was behind 9-11.
Reply-
0%
saintetienne9 months, 3 weeks ago
"Acturally, you should take your blinders off and investigate exactly who was behind 9-11."
oh GOD, not YOU, unome-moron.
Isn't your tin foil hat getting a little rusty? You better take it in to the tin foil hat cleaners.
Reply-
0%
GLee9 months, 3 weeks ago
What a HOOT!
Of course we went in and rigged explosives in the buildings to insure that they colapsed and gosh, noone even noticed. We also remotely guided those aircraft into both towers with our Hasbro contoller. GEZZZZZZZ.......
WAKE UP! We are at war with these Islamic Terrorist. The only thing that will wake some of you up is finding these
'crazies' in your own back yard. Don't hold your breath.
Reply-
0%
hamy9 months, 3 weeks ago
WE STARTED THE WAR!! Bush declared war on "terror" which makes us the aggressor.
You are pretty crazy yourself if you can't see past what this administration uses to distract you from their disasterous job of governing this country.
Reply-
0%
Codi69349 months, 3 weeks ago
UBL declared a jihad/war on us around 1996. It just took a while for us to get the memo.
Reply-
-
0%
Codi69349 months, 3 weeks ago
This one did. And he had the money and the followers to carry it out. This war is like no other in history. For the first time an idealology has declared war on a nation state. There are no uniforms, no front lines, no capitals to seize. Just people h*ll bent on the destruction of a society that in there mind is evil.
UBL and followers do not follow our ideal of war or our rules of war. They only know victory and death, anything short of death is victory to them.
Reply-
0%
Candida9 months, 3 weeks ago
Codi6934: "This war is like no other in history."
Only in the sense that it is called a war, which it is not. This kind of fighting is neither new, nor unique. Terrorism is probably as old as the history of mankind. Only the methods change, the essence of it remains the same. Terrorism is the fighting method of the weak. They don't have political power, and they don't command a huge military force, so they have to use the means available to them if they want to gain control. Sometimes they are called freedom fighters and sometimes they are called terrorists, depending on who is talking about them.
The Russian and Yugoslav partizans who fought against Nazi Germany had no uniforms, nor did the French underground. Algerians used terrorist techniques to get rid of the French, and so did the Israelis to get rid of the British. You can go back even farther. Check out the origin of the word "assassin." No, this is nothing new; it just hasn't been used against Americans.
Reply-
0%
Codi69349 months, 3 weeks ago
First:this is a war, whether you like it or not. Tell the families of the ones that did not come home that!
Second:This is new because we ,as Americans , can not understand their fascination with death. Like it or not our society has a belief of life, not death. And their will is stronger then ours.
And they are willing to do whatever, to complete a mission, right now, we lack that will.
AND THAT IS OUR PROBLEM!!!
Reply-
0%
Candida9 months, 3 weeks ago
Codi6934: "This is new because we ,as Americans..."
That was my point. This is new to Americans, but it's hardly new to mankind.
The problem is not that their will is stronger. The problem is that it is not at all clear what your mission is and how the current actions would lead to accomplishing it. If your mission were clear and just, you would have the will.
Tracking down terrorists and bringing them to justice would have been a clear mission. Attacking Afghanistan was already a bit iffy, but it was understandable. Attacking Iraq was bizarre and completely muddied the water on what the mission is.
Reply-
0%
Codi69349 months, 3 weeks ago
Netscape dumped my comment: short version
Attacking Afghanistan was already a bit iffy, what's so iffy?
Iraq violated the cease fire from Desert Storm, and Saddam could had stopped the invasion at any time.He chose not too!!
Quaddiffi(sp?) got his arsenal without a shot being fired.
Change the mind of our friends while we hunt our enemies.
Clearer now!
Reply
-
-
-
0%
Thinker229 months, 3 weeks ago
> Terrorism is probably as old as the history of mankind. Only the methods change, the essence of it remains the same.
False. As false as it goes. Terrorism is NOT "fighting method of the weak" but strategy of DELIBERATE MURDER OF NON-COMBATANTS to achieve political goals. The Nazis during WWII were NOT "the weak" but they've used this strategy and were, therefore, terrorists. Russian and Yugoslav partizans who fought against Nazi Germany had no uniforms and it did not make them terrorists for as long as they were fighting armed enemy combatants.
Reply-
-
0%
Thinker229 months, 2 weeks ago
I'm not sure what you're trying to prove but in case you're trying to say that American fighters dressed in regular clothes to try and fool the British were NOT terrorists this was exactly my point. You see, the British were... SOLDIERS.
It's not how one is dressed that makes him/her a terrorist. It's DELIBERATE KILLING OF NON-COMBATANTS that does the trick.
Reply-
-
0%
Thinker229 months, 2 weeks ago
> so as long as Iraqis kill only American soldiers, they are not terrorists?
No, they are (actually, would be) not terrorists. Unfortunately, they do not kill only American soldiers.
> What are they?
Considering that they deliberately murder hundreds of thousands of their own fellow Iraqis they ARE terrorists.
Reply
-
-
-
-
0%
Candida9 months, 2 weeks ago
Thinker22: "Russian and Yugoslav partizans who fought against Nazi Germany had no uniforms and it did not make them terrorists for as long as they were fighting armed enemy combatants."
What if they killed collaborators? Suspected collaborators? Germans when they knew fully well that a whole village of innocents would be destroyed in response? How about the Algerians who blew up seaside resorts? Or the Israelis blowing up a hotel? Israeli false flag operation in Egypt? French underground killing collaborators? The original "assassins"?
Terrorism is nothing new.
Reply-
0%
Thinker229 months, 2 weeks ago
> What if they killed collaborators? Suspected collaborators?
As long as collaborators and suspected collaborators were unarmed and did not fight DELIBERATE MURDER of these people WAS terrorism.
> Germans when they knew fully well that a whole village of innocents would be destroyed in response?
If armed fighters were hiding among and behind these innocent it means that these fighters were using them as shields and were responsible for their lives. Germans who were fighting those fighters had full right to do it despite the shields (human or otherwise).
Reply -
0%
Thinker229 months, 2 weeks ago
> How about the Algerians who blew up seaside resorts?
As far as I know there were no armed fighters in these resorts, therefore deliberate murder of unarmed civilians there was terrorism.
> Or the Israelis blowing up a hotel?
Jews blew up the Kind David Hotel where British Army headquarters were located. It happened prior to establishment of Israel, therefore, these people were NOT Israelis. Killing armed fighters during a war was NOT terrorism.
> Israeli false flag operation in Egypt?
I'm not sure what yo're taling about. Can you elaborate?
> French underground killing collaborators?
I've already answered the question about collaborators above.
> The original "assassins"?
The original "assassing" murdered unarmed innocent people for political reasons. Therefore, it WAS terrorism, pure and simple.
Is the definition of terrorism clear enough now?
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
0%
Thinker229 months, 3 weeks ago
> An individual can't declare war on a nation.
One does not have to "declare" a war on a nation (meaning sending toxedoed diplomats with officially signed and stamped document titled "Declaration of war") in order for a war to happen.
One has to START a war by initiating an act of aggression in order for a war to happen. An individual who happens to be a leader of an international terrorist empire certainly CAN do it.
Reply
-
-
-
-
-
0%
markoller9 months, 3 weeks ago
If the best argument you can come up with is the old tin foil hat ad-hominem, you are lying too.
Reply
-
-
0%
nahual9 months, 3 weeks ago
The problem we as a nation are facing is the current Bush Administration and the fear mongers who support it.
Last year at Christmas, the same Al Qaeda terrorists warnings at shopping malls were announced and nothing happenned.I am sure the local Chambers of Commerce love these pre holiday scare tactics.
Reply-
0%
tanglang9 months, 3 weeks ago
Last year at Christmas the FBI arrested a muslim man who was in possession of hand grenades. The man was caught on audio recorded from an undercover agent saying he was going set them off in an upper midwest shopping mall. This same man was also recorded as saying that it is the duty of all muslims to go to local Synogogues and kill all the Jews. He said that after he bombed the mall, he was going to his local Synogogue with and gun and a knife. He said he would shoot the men and cut all the womens throats.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/16110298/
Reply-
-
0%
tanglang9 months, 3 weeks ago
You're freakin hillarious! You seriously don't believe this happened? What, were you in Afghanistan last Christmas or something? I take it you live in a cave and you just got dsl. That's about the only way for you to have not heard about this last Christmas. They even released the some of the audio that the fbi recorded of this guy talking about his plans.
Reply
-
-
0%
lovemylibs9 months, 3 weeks ago
I know, nahual. I was disappointed also when there was no Christmas attack last year.
Reply
-
-
-
-
0%
not2needy9 months, 3 weeks ago
For real, i thought the reason we were in Iraq was to protect us from terrorists, also the reason we went to Afghanistan, but every event the US has, the message is the same. Red alert on terrorist attacks. If we're not safe here, while all our military is there, then bring them home to protet us HERE!
Reply
-
-
0%
Thinker229 months, 3 weeks ago
> Maybe if they do attack a shopping mall in LA, maybe those THAT WILL NOT SEE will FINALLY get it...
No way. They'll declare that Bush and Mossad did it. Just like Bush and Mossad organized the 9/11 and the USS Liberty.
Reply
-
-
0%
ProudBlueTexan9 months, 3 weeks ago
Read the article; rarely do they admit it's hollow threat:
"The source reportedly had only "indirect access" to al Qaeda and word of the actual threat came to U.S. intelligence officers "through a lengthy chain" of contacts."
"We have no credible, specific information suggesting an imminent attack," a DHS official said."
Be afraid if you just have to. As for me:
"Give me liberty or give me death." You got the balls to make a statement like that?
Reply -
0%
hamy9 months, 3 weeks ago
Things are going to happen! That's just it! We lived with the same threat looming over our heads before 9-11 just as we live with it now. Don't you get it? Being so afraid of it isn't going to keep it from happening. No amount of "intelligence" is going to keep them from blowing something up if they really want to do it.
You are the one with blinders on if you don't remember the 80's and the terrorist attacks all over Europe.
And you are an even bigger imbecile if you don't think that Bush's foreign policies have made us an even bigger target.
Reply-
0%
Thinker229 months, 2 weeks ago
> ...you are an even bigger imbecile if you don't think that Bush's foreign policies have made us an even bigger target.
Consider this: Do you believe that the terrorists would somehow become peace-loving individuals if we (and other victims of terrorism) would do NOTHING in response to their actions?
If you do believe so think about the Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that followed the first WTC bombing; the USS Cole that followed the Embassies; 9/11/2001 that f
-
-
-
-
-
